Check it out:
Turkish Government Bans YouTube!
No more YouTube!
In Turkey there is a law called article 301 which has made it illegal to insult ‘Turkishness’ since coming into effect in June of 2005. The article states:
<<<
Article 301 states the following.[6]
- A person who publicly denigrates Turkishness, the Republic or the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, shall be punishable by imprisonment of between six months and three years.
- A person who publicly denigrates the Government of the Republic of Turkey, the judicial institutions of the State, the military or security organizations shall be punishable by imprisonment of between six months and two years.
- In cases where denigration of Turkishness is committed by a Turkish citizen in another country the punishment shall be increased by one third.
- Expressions of thought intended to criticize shall not constitute a crime.
>>> (excerpt from wikipedia.org)
The law has been used to persecute journalists, writers, bloggers, poets even people for public speeches they have given. The most notable cases were against Nobel Prize winner Orhan Pamuk for an interview he gave for a swiss magazine (charges were dropped against him), Wordpress.com - an online blogging community, and most recently YouTube (it has been banned several times over the past year), for a video of Kemal Mustafa Attaturk singing about how he is a homosexual (at least these are the major incidents that i know of)
I am sure you can all see what an obvious violation of freedom of speech this law represents. The current government has been ruthless about persecuting journalists, shutting down newspapers, blocking websites. They must think they have a mandate from Attaturk himself to protect the Turkish identity. In the international community, the European Union has insisted Turkey remove this law. Although allowing international law and international treaties to override Turkish national law, Article 301 is nonetheless a clear violation of fundamental freedoms and political rights. There has been talk of removing the law, but it has been more than one year since president Abdullah Gul suggested removing the law. Instead the government recently lifted a long standing law from the early days of the republic banning head scarves in public areas, but that’s a whole other story.
Regardless of whether or not this law stays active or is repealed, Turks will feel very strongly about their Turkishness. In my experience it seems that the Turkish identity and Attaturk (the prophet of this religion like nationalism) are more sacred than Islam in Turkey. There are many mosques in Turkey, and many people fast during the month of Ramadan, but there is at least one picture of Attaturk in nearly every business in the whole country. While religion is important here and it is observed, Attaturk and Turkishness are indoctrinated by the state. In school, teachers teach how great Attaturk was, they teach how about how important everything he did was. His drive to secularize Turkey is what saved Turkey from the mess that many of the other Islamic nations are in right now (Iran, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Libya). In some ways Attaturk has god-like status here, in other ways he’s far beyond that. Recently we met a man who had Attaturk’s face tattooed on his arm.
This intensity sometimes manifests itself in violence against those who do not share this view point. With the state prosecuting “anti-Turkish” antagonists, vigilantes within the community do so as well. Hrant Dink, former editor in chief of the bilingual Turkish-Armenian newspaper Agos, is the most notable case in recent history. He was a very vocal critic of both the Armenian and Turkish stances on the ‘Armenian genocide’ (Related Blog Post: Turmoil in Turkey: Part II). He had been prosecuted three times for his opinions about the incident before a young ultra nationalist Turk, Ogun Samast, assassinated him in January 2007. Pictures later surfaced of the arresting officers smiling and congratulating the killer while holding a Turkish flag. What kind of message does that send? Another notable case was Michael Dickinson, a British artist who made a collage showing the Turkish prime minister as a dog. He was held for 10 days. You can see the picture in question below:

He later showed this collage, again of the prime minister, getting himself into trouble again:

I find both picture entertaining especially considering what my friends, and many of the other educated people in Turkey have to say about the current government. To any of my Turkish readers, I pose this question: Is Turkey getting better in terms of human rights and freedom of speech? I would like to hear some opinions other than my own on this one.
With YouTube banned, what am I going to do at work on the slow days. At least I know that I can always retreat back to my home country, where I can say what ever I damn well please.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Recent Comments